Goldman: Tax-cut effect would be small

Tuesday, 10 October 2017, 06:59:41 PM. According to President Trump, there's one overriding reason America needs tax cuts: They'll get the economy humming. 'It's called a middle-class miracle,' Trump said at the end of September.

According to President Trump, there's one overriding reason America needs tax cuts: They'll get the economy humming. "It's called a middle-class miracle," Trump said at the end of September.

But here's the catch: The White House says the U.S. economy is going to be vastly better off after slashing taxes, but just about everyone else says the impacts will be modest, especially for the middle class.

This isn't a liberal vs. conservative debate. This is a White House and top GOP leaders vs. pretty much everyone else debate.

America averaged about 2 percent growth a year for much of the recovery under President Barack Obama. After tax cuts, Trump promises annual growth of 3 percent or more (the White House website currently predicts 4 percent gross domestic product growth a year under Trump).

The vast majority of economists - on Wall Street, at big corporations, and in academia - forecast just 2.1 percent to 2.25 percent growth after tax cuts, hardly an economic renaissance.

Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street bank that supplied some of Trump's top economic advisers, keeps telling its clients to expect a "modest" impact from the Trump-GOP tax plan.

Here's how Goldman put it in a research report last week: "Overall, the research literature appears to suggest that tax cuts can have modestly positive supply-side effects, though some studies find no effect," Goldman wrote.

"Modestly positive" - with a side of "some studies find no effect" - is far from the "giant" and "massive" uptick Trump promises.

Goldman Sachs is hardly a liberal organization. It's a Wall Street bank that was dubbed the "vampire squid" during the Great Recession because it sucked up profits as so many people on Main Street lost out. Goldman Sachs also has a reputation for being very optimistic, routinely telling clients the stock market and economy are going to soar. So when Goldman says expect only 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent growth from Trump's tax cuts, it's telling.

This debate between the White House and independent economists matters because Trump's and Republican leaders' push for tax legislation is that, they claim, it will lead to more growth, which should, in turn, lead to more jobs and higher wages. If the growth is puny, it's unlikely to do much for jobs or wages. It's also likely to add heavily to America's $20 trillion debt if the tax cuts aren't offset with spending cuts or tax increases elsewhere.

Lately, Trump has been dispensing his deputies to hammer the message home that lower taxes will bring a big economic boost. Kevin Hassett, the head of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, is currently making the rounds in the Washington think tank circles.

"I'll repeat it again: Existing evidence clearly indicates taxes matter for the economy," Hassett, a Ph.D. economist, said Thursday at an event at the Urban Institute in the District. He predicted GDP would go up "much more than 1 percent" to 3 percent GDP a year (or better) after the Trump tax plan is enacted.

"For the median household in the U.S., a top corporate marginal rate cut from 35 to 20 percent would boost wage growth almost fourfold - from the current 0.6 percent per year to as much as 2 percent, providing up to $7,000 in additional income," Hassett argued. (He is the coauthor of a research paper that says every $1 of higher business taxes leads to $2 less in wages.)

But Goldman Sachs sees it differently. Economists at the Wall Street bank concluded that shareholders - the people who own stock in a company - typically get most of the benefits of tax cuts, at least in the first few years. Down the road, workers may see some uptick in wages, but it depends on whether businesses actually take the extra money from tax cuts and invest in more factories and technology. Economists are skeptical that will happen, especially if the tax plan ends up adding to the U.S. debt.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines Commenting policy | Comments FAQ

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Load comments

Share this
Article Goldman: Tax-cut effect would be small compiled by www.philly.com